Wednesday, 30 June 2004

"IMF Trade Integration Mechanism: Sweetening a sour deal":

With much fanfare, the Board of the IMF approved the Trade Integration Mechanism (TIM) in April, a new "insurance policy" to entice developing countries back to the multilateral trade table. The mechanism marks a concession by the Fund that trade liberalisation is not beneficial for all countries all of the time, and that funds should be made available to the losers. Importantly however, the TIM makes funds available only for countries which suffer damages as a result of others' liberalisation; offers no new money; and may require applicants to undergo additional structural adjustment.

Qualification for TIM funds would be limited to countries that are hurt when other countries increase market access or remove trade subsidies. This would, for example, include countries which lose preferential market access, or food-importing countries which lose the benefit of subsidised agricultural products. The Fund says that countries are unlikely to suffer from their own liberalisation but if they do it is covered by existing Fund programmes. A further qualification restricts the mechanism's use to damages inflicted by changes in the multilateral regime only. Reflecting the Fund's bias against sub-international agreements, changes in regional or south-south agreements do not qualify for the TIM.

TIM funds are only available as loans, coming as part of a conventional arrangement with the Fund. Recipients will add to their existing debt load for damages caused by a restructuring in the global trade system beyond their control. The time given to repay the debt and the interest rate charged will depend on which arrangement a country holds with the Fund. Low-income countries will be charged concessional rates while middle-income countries will pay market rates. Disbursement of the TIM will depend on countries implementing at least the same number of conditions that are demanded by the larger programme: "In some cases, however, conditionality specifically related to the adjustments that the TIM is designed to support may be called for."

There is some question of whether countries will ever receive any money under the TIM at all, or indeed if this was ever the intention. Critics point to the experience with the Fund's Compensatory Financing Facility (CFF), a programme established in the 1960s to assist countries hurt by fluctuating world commodity prices. The CFF has remained virtually unused because countries have not wanted to go into debt for damages incurred as a result of an unfair global trading system. Timeliness and inflexibility have also restricted the CFF in practice. The TIM may suffer from the same problems.

An additional concern lies in the methodology used to calculate the damages caused to a country by others' liberalisation. Based on the Fund's enthusiastic support for all forms of trade liberalisation, Fund economists are prone to seeing any negative impacts of liberalisation as symptoms of poor or incomplete policy implementation. Witness Acting Managing Director Anne Krueger's recent comments: "The clear evidence is that only a very small number of countries will ever find themselves needing the assistance that the TIM offers. But if its existence helps provide policymakers in those countries with the assurance they need, it should make it much easier for them to embrace the Doha Development Agenda".

A number of developing country members, including Mauritius, Bangladesh, Jamaica and Colombia, reacted negatively to the presentation of the TIM to the WTO General Council 18 May, noting that its focus on balance of payment problems was too limited. The Kenyan representative feared that the TIM might be a diversion from the more important issue of market access: "if such contradictions are left unresolved swift solutions that are prescribed will make matters worse for developing countries."

Bretton Woods Project Item URL
Knowledge is power. The World Bank’s Development Gateway is a way of centralising and entrenching their power.



The declaration below has been written and endorsed by a spectrum of "knowledge workers" - an unlovely term for people who research or discuss development issues in the media, in education and in other areas -who are deeply concerned with the implications of the Bank's new internet project.

This declaration is unlike previous petitions against the Bank's initiative. There is no attempt to lobby the World Bank or alter the Gateway's structure or content. Previous such attempts have resulted in only marginal or cosmetic changes. Rather, this letter encourages people not to contribute to or use this Bank-backed scheme. The signatories of this letter have pledged to avoid any contact with the Bank's development gateway, and to push forward with their own diverse research and publication agendas, including independent internet schemes.

This is a declaration that can be signed by anyone. Please mention any institutional affiliation when you sign - which will be for identification purposes and won't imply the endorsement of your organisation. Send a message to gateway@voiceoftheturtle.org with your name and organization in the subject line. Or add your name below, forward the message to others and return the open letter to gateway@voiceoftheturtle.org if you are the 100th , 200th, etc. signatory.

Please distribute this call widely to your contacts. If every recipient sends it to at least five people or lists, then we can soon achieve a broader coverage than the World Bank's hired PR company.

This open letter will be posted (with signatories) on the Voice of the Turtle website and on the Bretton Woods Project Gateway page. See also the recent Bretton Woods Project briefing on the Gateway.

Raj Patel
for
The Voice of the Turtle


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Development Gateway: A Declaration from Concerned Knowledge Workers

Dear friends,

In July the World Bank will launch a multi-million dollar internet-based development knowledge initiative at www.developmentgateway.org .

Trumpeted as a place to find diverse perspectives on development, the Bank argues that its Development Gateway will be a convenient tool for civil society groups, officials, journalists and independent researchers. We disagree. On closer scrutiny, the Development Gateway initiative looks less like an attempt to encourage debate than a means to stifle, moderate and control dissenting opinion. We wish to warn colleagues of the perils of associating with or supporting this project.

There are three fundamental objections to the Gateway project. First the gateway privileges certain voices over others. The Gateway does not prioritise poorer people as site contributors, editors or viewers. The Bank's heavy English-language bias exacerbates the dominance of official 'development knowledge'. You will not find topics on "political economy" or "inequality" or "discrimination", just concepts like "governance" and "human development". Moreover the Gateway's 130-issue taxonomy ghettoises cross-cutting issues such as gender and climate change.

Second, the claim that the site is independent is untenable. This is a clear attempt by the Bank to consolidate itself and its allies as the main authorities on "development knowledge". This is reflected in both the content and process of the Gateway. For instance, in order to provide local content, the Gateway has its own country portals. These will be run by government officials, private business and civil society groups appointed without any clear criteria of representativeness. The content of these gateways will be policed. Within these country gateways, site contributors are told to avoid "country/locale specific events", and not to use metaphors, puns or irony in order "to aid machine translation".

The Bank is appointing individual or institutional "topic guides" to filter and organise material in each of the site's subject areas. The Gateway is supposed to represent all perspectives and all types of analysis. The only reason to exclude items is if they fail to meet the site's "quality" criteria, yet it remains extremely unclear as to how this quality threshold is determined. And given the volume and diversity of information posted on the internet daily, it is unlikely that the guides' coverage will be comprehensive. With the best will in the world, then, topic guides' selections will be biased in favour of the intellectual tastes of themselves and their contacts.

The third, and most pernicious, effect of the development gateway is to undermine alternatives. Instead of encouraging existing initiatives, the Bank has chosen to centralise internet coverage of development issues in a bid to sift and control the flow of ideas. This is likely to distract from and damage the development of diverse, independent internet sites on these issues.

This is why, in our individual capacities, we pledge to avoid all contact, whether official or otherwise, with the World Bank's Development Gateway. We encourage our colleagues to undertake a similar pledge, and to support alternative sources of knowledge.

Signed (as individuals, organisation names provided for reference only)

Initial signatories:

Yash Tandon, International South Group Network, Zimbabwe
Patrick Bond, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
Phil McMichael, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Chris Brooke, Magdalen College, Oxford University
Rutendo Kambarami, Communications Officer, Mwelekeo waNGO, Zimbabwe

Further signatories

1. Raj Patel, SEATINI, Harare

2.

To sign, send a message to gateway@voiceoftheturtle.org with your name and organization in the subject line. Or add your name here, forward the message to others and return the open letter to gateway@voiceoftheturtle.org if you are the 100th , 200th, etc. signatory.

Bretton Woods Project
The World Bank’s knowledge roles: dominating development debates
At Issue | 28th May 2004 | Alex Wilks | URL

Also available as a fully-formatted PDF file.

Since 1996 the World Bank's President has emphasised his institution's roles as a "knowledge bank". Producing and deploying knowledge is clearly important. But just as one person's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, what some see as knowledge is viewed by others as propaganda for a particular world view.

There is a strong tension between the World Bank's messages that it is keen to move away from blueprint approaches, and its many documents, speeches and indicators which claim to set out and measure "the right policies". As a huge bureaucracy dominated by rich countries, it struggles to be trusted as a neutral judge of development policies.

A recent assessment of the Bank's knowledge strategy found many problems with its approach and impact. The evaluation report demonstrated some of the black arts of bureaucratic knowledge filtering, burying some of the most important critical evidence in Annex G at the end of the document. The officials managing the Development Gateway - a controversial World Bank internet initiative - have also demonstrated such skills, burying the documentation which outlined its original aims and objectives. And authors of successive World Development Reports (WDRs) - the Bank's annual flagship publication - have complained that they cannot be specific about the negative activities of any government because a Bank board member may call for it to be removed. Senior Bank research staff have complained that "thought police" operate in the institution, setting limits on what is researched and disseminated.

The Knowledge Bank
The Knowledge Bank consists of:

knowledge-sharing among Bank staff;
regional and country external knowledge sharing;
global knowledge initiatives.
The Bank states that between 1997 and 2002 $283 million was spent on reorganising the Bank to be a knowledge institution. Far more was spent on actual activities such as training and reports. The Bank's research is widely disseminated and highly respected among many important audiences. A Swedish government study in 2000 concluded that "the World Bank continues to be dominant as the main purveyor of development ideas".

These findings indicate that the Bank's analytical approaches influence policy-making across the world even if the Bank is not involved directly. The International NGO Forum on Indonesian Development stated: "the World Bank has enormous influence over the shape and pace of Indonesia's policies and reform in its own right, but it also wields great influence through its production of the economic analysis that serves as the information base on which other creditors and donors rely to make decisions".

A recent study by the World Bank's Operations Evaluation Department (OED) found significant problems with the Bank's self-appointed role as guardian and disseminator of the world's development knowledge. The study combines desk reviews of the Bank's knowledge outputs with a five-country survey of 120 people from government, NGOs, the media, and the private sector.

The evaluation notes: "the majority of respondents said the Bank presents 'ready-made' solutions that are not adapted to individual country circumstances. They argue that the Bank is reluctant to consider alternative models and solutions". A government representative from Brazil stated: "these 'best practices' come to us as norms; they become guidelines. They could bring a very positive effect, but also a negative one. If I'm in Brazil and I observe that there's not a correct vision of the situation, then I begin to question this best practice".

The OED notes that "for a majority of respondents, this insistence that the Bank's way is the only way underlies most [Bank] reports, strategic models, and policy analyses". But the evaluators fail to analyse this properly, almost certainly because the OED is itself a part of the Bank's global knowledge bureaucracy.

Structural difficulties
Comments from Bank staff in the World Bank staff association newsletter two years ago revealed severe dissatisfaction with how the Bank treated its own researchers. One questioned whether the Bank's "public image matters more than germane research findings", pointing out that staff guidelines on getting press articles approved before publishing "come perilously close to saying that staff members must not publicly suggest changes in the institution's practice". Senior Bank researcher David Ellerman complained of "bureaucratic conformity", with public relations staff acting as "thought police to the black sheep in the organization who are not 'on message'".

Researchers who might want to publish radical views (such as Branko Milanovic on trade and globalisation) have their draft publications returned for rewriting. They face a choice either to learn to draft reports which do not deviate too far from the party line, or to depart early, as have Ravi Kanbur, Joseph Stiglitz and William Easterly for example, all very senior Bank researchers. "Just as operations people are rewarded for giving out loans, Bank researchers are rewarded for bolstering the 'intellectual' basis for further Bank lending" concludes Robin Broad, a professor at American University, in a paper delivered this March at the International Studies Association conference, after numerous interviews with current and former World Bank research staff.

There have been some scathing external analyses of the Knowledge Bank. Morten Boas and Desmond McNeill argue that in the Bank and IMF "ideas that challenge the conventional wisdom become distorted as a result of depoliticization and 'economization'". Helge Ole Bergesen and Leiv Lunde concluded "the Bank's two ambitions - to be a premier development institution helping to forge common agendas on major issues and a large-scale funder of projects are not compatible [as] they require qualitatively different governing structures, the one emphasizing equal participation and open, time-consuming processes, the other requiring hierarchical order and effective decision-making."

It is often remarked that the Bank tends to hire researchers with doctorates in economics from a narrow range of US and UK universities. But what is the role of other non-economics researchers in the Bank, of whom there are many? Michael Horowitz, Professor of Anthropology at Birhampton University, argues that social scientists are marginalised in the Bank, working on fringe issues rather than "the structure of power and wealth which controls access to resources".

Conflicts of interest: in-country research
In every country where it lends the Bank conducts or commissions a large range of studies on current issues. These range from public spending to tariff reduction, from primary schooling to natural resource protection. The studies make recommendations which are often taken very seriously by borrower government officials negotiating funding with the Bank and other aid agencies. Since the introduction of the PRSP process - which was supposed to devolve policy-making to developing countries - the Bank is paradoxically increasing its output of such studies, meaning that countries are flooded with expatriate consultants telling them how to make policy.

Civil society groups and some officials have, however, demanded that the Bank carry out some of this research in a new way. The Bank, under pressure from NGOs and some governments, has agreed to help produce Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA). This claims to make available further analysis of the likely impact of proposed policies to help foster an informed national debate. Around 70 PSIA studies are said to be underway at present.

Ministers in the HIPC Finance Ministers Network (which brings together ministers from 33 indebted countries) agree with the intentions of PSIA but urged the World Bank and IMF to "equip countries with the tools to conduct their own PSIAs rather than depending on outside assistance. These tools should have input from the Bretton Woods Institutions and donors, but be administered and disseminated by independent capacity-building sources, to avoid conflict of interest for partners in the negotiation process".

Pride and prejudice: the Gateway
The World Bank established the Development Gateway, one of several global knowledge-sharing initiatives in 2000. This claimed to be a means to use the Internet as "a tool to address development issues and increase the effectiveness of development assistance", and to be a partnership with civil society groups. But from the beginning the Bretton Woods Project and others argued that it demonstrated the Bank's inability to listen to critical views, and failure to understand that people have fundamentally different approaches to development questions.

A forthcoming study commissioned by Bretton Woods Project finds that the Gateway remains closely linked to the World Bank at both operational and strategic levels, that the information is predominantly from northern sources, that its operations are not transparent or accountable to civil society, and that there is no clear identification of who the beneficiaries are and how they might benefit. The information on the Gateway's topic and country pages is poorly organised, narrow in its origin and presentation (see table) and has a strong bias towards technological topics at the expense of social and political ones. Its cost-effectiveness is very poor compared with other Internet portals.


Privatisation (as %) Trade (as %)
Resources in English 100 92
Number of user comments 7 6
WB published material 41 4
Southern material 13 18

Analysis of 100 most recent entries to Development Gateway topic sections, March 2004. (Jha, Seymour and Simms for Bretton Woods Project, 2004)

Diverse critical voices
It is by no means just radical civil society voices who urge the Bank to think again on its knowledge roles. The former director of the Bank's research department, Nancy Birdsall, urged an end to "the analytic near-monopoly of the World Bank on the details of pension reform, privatisation, the ideal bank deposit insurance system, and so many of the other issues of economic and social reform." Robert Wade, Professor of Political Economy at the London School of Economics, asks "whether the world is served by having as the principle provider of development statistics an organisation exposed to arm-twisting by its member states and needing to defend itself against constant criticism. We would not want Philip Morris research labs to be the only source of data on the effects of smoking even if the research met professional standards."

A further problem is that the Bank has positioned itself as a major funder and trainer of other research organisations. In a consultation meeting on a World Development Report Mohamed Suleiman, director of the Institute for African Alternatives, spoke alarmingly of the Bank's ability to "spread a grey cloud of conformity" over the outputs of many organisations which either receive funding from the Bank or may want to in future. The African Economic Research Consortium, for example, which has just been awarded the contract to provide advice to African Executive Directors to the Bank and Fund, has received significant Bank support. The Bank's roles in this area are significantly reinforced by bilateral donors which provide additional funding to the Bank to encourage it to take an interest in policy issues they see as important. The Danish government, for example, promoted the concept of social capital in this way. But a flurry of Bank activity on this issue in the late 1990s has left little more trace than an outdated web database.

Internal reviews are clearly not going to reign in the Bank's knowledge activities which provide it so much income, prestige and intellectual justification for its policies. This means the challenge will have to come from outside. A growing number of activists are realising the importance of the Bank's 'soft power' and are challenging it at country and global levels.

[A previous version of this 'at issue' incorrectly stated that Ajay Chhibber, Director of the World Bank's Operations Evaluation Department was lead author of the WDR 1998/9 on knowledge. We apologise for this error.]

Tuesday, 29 June 2004

News - World Bank E-Library Increases Access To Valuable Research: "World Bank E-Library Increases Access To Valuable Research
Over 1,900 research papers added to the World Bank e-Library



Washington, June 23, 2004� The breadth of development information offered by the World Bank e-Library has more than doubled, providing a wider array of key economic and social research to users around the world. Over 1,900 Policy Research Working Papers were recently added to the 1,300 publications available on the World Bank e-Library, a commercial, subscription-based research and reference tool. The addition of these papers is the first in a series of enhancements to the e-Library.
The Policy Research Working Papers disseminate findings of research work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. The papers, dating back to 1995, cover a broad range of topics and countries, from Indonesia�s palm oil policy to agricultural transfer technology in Nicaragua to wage determination and gender discrimination in transition economies."

Sunday, 27 June 2004


New look site
Baljit Grewal

Saturday, 26 June 2004

Online World Seen as Resource for Public Good, Survey Finds


Online World Seen as Resource for Public Good, Survey Finds

An international survey of Internet users finds strong support for creating a global information society, a result that is consistent with goals adopted at the World Summit on the Information Society in December 2003. The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) issued the survey results May 17 in recognition of World Telecommunications Day.

Cyberspace should be a resource shared by all and used for sustainable economic and social development, according to 94 percent of the respondents.

"ICTs [information and communication technologies] alone may not feed the hungry, eradicate poverty or reduce child mortality, but they are an increasingly important catalyst that spurs economic growth and social equity," said Yoshio Utsumi, secretary-general of ITU. "ICTs allow for more efficient agricultural production, diversity and distribution. They offer the possibility of delivering basic health services to those in dire need living in areas with little or no access to healthcare facilities. They can extend the reach of educators allowing them to bring knowledge to the most remote corners of our planet."

The highest priority goals identified by the 1250 respondents on all continents were establishing connectivity at educational institutions, first, and at scientific and research centers, a close second.

The World Summit on the Information Society was convened under U.N. auspices and ended with endorsement of a plan of action to expand the benefits of information technologies to underserved economies. The documents approved at the summit are available at http://www.itu.int/wsis/

The full release complete with graphs depicting results is available at http://www.itu.int/newsroom/press_releases/2004/12.html



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Following is an excerpt of the ITU press release

International Telecommunication Union
Press Release

'Global' Support for Information Society Targets

Cyberspace seen as a Shared Resource for the Global Public Good
Results Released on World Telecommunication Day

Geneva, 17 May 2004 - Targets set for improving access and connectivity to information and communication technologies (ICT) by 2015 at the first phase of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) have received strong support in a global ITU survey.

The Summit approved a Declaration of Principles and Plan of Action that set forth a roadmap to bring the benefits of ICT to underserved economies. The Summit was organized by ITU under the patronage of UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan to ensure that social and economic development, which is increasingly driven by ICTs, will result in a more just, prosperous and equitable world.

The survey shows overwhelming support for the belief that if the information society is to be one in which all citizens throughout the world can equally access and use information resources for sustainable economic and social development, that cyberspace should be declared a resource to be shared by all for the global public good. This opinion was held by more than 94% of survey respondents (see Figure 1). And these results were consistent across all the regions surveyed

ICTs: Leading the way to sustainable development

The survey was released on World Telecommunication Day, which commemorates the founding of the International Telecommunication Union in 1865. ITU, the oldest multilateral organization in the world, chose to celebrate its 139thanniversary with the theme "ICTs: Leading the way to sustainable development."

Mr Yoshio Utsumi, Secretary-General of ITU, notes that "ICTs alone may not feed the hungry, eradicate poverty or reduce child mortality, but they are an increasingly important catalyst that spurs economic growth and social equity. ICTs allow for more efficient agricultural production, diversity and distribution. They offer the possibility of delivering basic health services to those in dire need living in areas with little or no access to healthcare facilities. They can extend the reach of educators allowing them to bring knowledge to the most remote corners of our planet."

Mr Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary-General adds that, "on World Telecommunication Day, let us resolve to do all we can to lead the way to a truly open, inclusive and prosperous telecommunications age." The entire text of Mr Annan and Mr Utsumi's messages can be found here.

Global Connectivity Targets Ranked

The 10 targets in the WSIS Plan of Action for improving access and connectivity to ICTs by 2015, which were endorsed by 175 Member States, were all rated as very important to achieving an information society that would benefit all of humanity. Again, these results were consistent regardless of region, gender, age or profession of those who responded to the survey.

The targets for 2015, as accepted in the WSIS Plan of Action, and their rankings are as follows:

1. Connecting universities, colleges, secondary schools and primary schools with ICTs:

85.43% viewed this target as a very important.

2. Connecting scientific and research centres with ICTs:

84.76% viewed this target as a very important.

3. Ensuring that more than half the world's inhabitants have access to ICTs within their reach:

69.2% viewed this target as a very important. It was rated higher in Africa and the Arab States (83% and 82%) and less so in Europe and Austalasia (64% and 55%).

4. Connecting villages with ICTs and establishing community access points:

65.75% viewed this target as a very important. This target was rated even higher in Africa and Asia (79.44% and 72.73%).

5. Connecting all local and central government departments and establish websites and email addresses:

65.53% ranked this as very important, with it rated higher in Africa (80.56%) and Asia (71.90%).

6. Connecting health centres and hospitals with ICTs:

64.89% of respondents view this as a very important goal. However, it was considered less so in Europe (57%), while in Africa and the Arab States it was significantly higher (74% and 78%). This may reflect a greater belief in those regions of the potential that ICTs hold for extending health services to people in remote or less developed areas.

7. Connecting public libraries, cultural centres, museums, post offices and archives with ICTs:

64.87% ranked this as very important. This target was rated considerably higher in Africa (76%) and Asia (73%) but less so in Europe (59%) and the Americas (68%). The results may reflect the relative availability of information technologies as a resource in libraries in Europe and the Americas.

8. Adapting all primary and secondary school curricula to meet the challenges of the Information Society, taking into account national circumstances:

62.82% ranked this as very important, with a range of 55% (Europe) to 76% in the Arab States and the Americas.

9. Encouraging the development of content and to put in place technical conditions in order to facilitate the presence and use of all world languages on the Internet:

52.79% viewed this as very important, with a range of 45% in Europe to 70% in the Arab States.

10. Ensuring that all of the world's population have access to television and radio services:

47.80% ranked this as very important. The ranking of 'very important' was significantly lower in Australasia and Europe (30% and 43%) but much higher in Africa (70%). Again, this may reflect the current availability of the technology in these regions.

About the Survey

The survey was conducted online between 10 April and 10 May 2004. The 1250 respondents were from Africa (8.71%), Asia (9.8%), Australasia (3.02%), the Americas (22.07%), Europe (52.6%) and the Arab States (3.10%). The response rates in these regions reflect the telecommunication access indicators, as determined for WSIS in the World Telecommunication Development Report 2003 and are consistent with the "digital divide" that separates developed nations from less developed ones.

20.78% of respondents identified themselves as working for government, 8.56% for international organizations, 21.03% as civil society, 35.41% as business and 14.21% as media.

Friday, 25 June 2004


This is a better one
Baljit Grewal

This is a screenshot of my Flickr collection
Baljit Grewal
The Valley of Flowers

IT is a Wordsworthean setting! Situated in a lonely corner, high in the Himalayan ranges of the Garhwal region in Uttaranchal, at a height of more than 3000 metres, the Valley of Flowers remains under a blanket of snow for almost six months a year, from October to March.

Hidden from the eyes of civilisation, this valley was known as the Bhyundar Valley, the playground of fairies and nymphs. Legends associate it with the area from where Hanuman collected the Sanjeevani herb to revive Lakshmana, the younger brother of Lord Rama.

The Valley of Flowers was first introduced to the world by Frank S. Smith, a representative of the Edinburgh Botanical Gardens in 1931. However, some believe that the Valley of Flowers was first seen accidentally by R.L. Holdsworth, botanist, but the actual exploratory work was done by Frank S. Smith who camped there for several weeks in 1937.




Smith authored a book called The Valley of Flowers, which unveiled the beauty and floral splendours of the valley. He described his experiences thus: "The wonders of this valley are its flowering plants. You find here different branches of same plant yielding flowers of different colours and varying fragrance. All these coupled with fauna combine to make a superb and harmonious ensemble."


The Valley of Flowers, which remains covered in snow from October to March, becomes accessible from late April onwards


In 1939, Margarate Legge, a botanist deputed by the Botanical Gardens of Edinburgh, arrived at the valley for further studies. While she was traversing some rocky slopes to collect flowers, she slipped off and was lost for ever in the Valley of Flowers. Her sister later visited the valley and erected a memorial on the spot where she was buried by the locals. The memorial is still there and the lines inscribed on the marble slab read:

"I will lift up mine eyes into the Hills from whence cometh my strength."

Rishikesh is the starting point for a journey to the valley. From here, buses and taxis are available for Joshimath, the main halting station at a distance of about 250 km. From Joshimath, one has to motor another 20 km to Govind Ghat, from where the trek starts. People coming from the east can travel from Haldwani to Nainital, Gwaldam, Karanprayag and then proceed to Joshimath.

The 250-km drive up to Joshimath is awe-inspiring. An important transit town, this place also has some ancient temples and other places of tourist interest. Reasonably good accommodation is available here.


The polygamous weed has been destroying the flora in the valley


The trek towards the valley begins at Govind Ghat after crossing the Alakananda river on a hanging bridge. This gurgling river was earlier seen at Rishikesh as the Ganga in all her serenity and majesty. Alakananda, here in her adolescence, is playful and sprightly. Crossing the left bank, the mule track immediately ascends in a zig-zag manner. Along the track you have a small tributary of the Alakananda river known as the Laxman Ganga. The waters of the Laxman Ganga are biting cold. The water of this rivulet has been channelised into a canal that feeds a small hydropower plant at Govind Ghat.

The zig-zag track suddenly straightens into a gradual climb through a valley of terraced fields and wild vegetation. The Laxman Ganga tumbles down to join the Alakananda. On the other bank of the Laxman Ganga is a range of rocky mountains. A number of trekkers and pilgrims take this route to visit Hemkunt Sahib.

A small rivulet from Bhyundar village, which opens to a picteresque valley, joins the Laxman Ganga. Far above, a snow-capped peak known as Hathi Parvat, looks down benignly on the valley. After resting here for a while, the trek to the Valley of Flowers continues through rich vegetation.

The Valley of Flowers is nearly six kilometres in length and two kilometres in width. The height at its entrance is 3352 metres and it goes up to 3656 metres at some places. At the entrance of the valley, a track emanates from Baman Dhaura on the right bank of a stream called the Pushpawati and goes on to a pass called Khantakhal at a height of 5440 metres.


The yellow-coloured pedicularis, grandiflora and ligularia lend a celestial touch to the valley in July and August


The Valley of Flowers is an alpine valley, and has been formed by the retreating glaciers whose periodic advances pulverised hard rocks, resulting in a smooth U-shaped valley which was later colonised by numerous plants. The valley remains covered by snow from October to April but when the ice melts in June, it gets invaded by a profusion of colours. Some important flowering plants which have tremendous medicinal value are anemone, geranium, marsh, marigold, primula, potentilla, aster, lilium, Himalayan blue poppy, delphinium, ranunculus, corydalis, inula, saussurea abvallata, campanula, pedicularis, trysimum, morina, impetienns, bistorta, ligularia, anaphalis saxifraga, lobelia, thermophis, trolises, aquilogia, codonopsis, dactylorhiza and rhododendron.

Apart from flowering plants, the valley abounds in wildlife like Himalayan birds, phigents, butterflies, tendula, musk deer, bharal (mountain goats), Himalayan bear and tailless rat. The Valley of Flowers is an irresistible treat for naturalists, ecologists, environmentalists, zoologists, ornithologists, trekkers, tourists and pilgrims.

The valley becomes accessible from late April onwards, when the snow starts melting and flowing down buttresses and gullies. The water pouring down the slopes provides appropriate moisture to the flowering plants. The moist turf begins to pulsate with life and from the dead herbage of the previous summer, innumerable shoots of countless plants rise expectantly as though in anticipation of the approaching monsoon.


Brahmkamal, a rare plant, is found in the valley


Primulas cover up slopes in the most heavenly shade of French blue. Their soft petals covered with dew emanate the sweetest of scents. In the lush meadows drifts of snow-white anemones drench the ground.

With the arrival of rains in June, balsam, geranium, pedicularis and many other species, mostly in pink and red, set the dominating colour pattern of the valley without subduing other seasonal shades of yellow, purple and white.

From late July to the end of August, the valley begins to take on celestial dimensions. The riot of colours is awe-inspiring. The pedicularis, grandiflora, ligularia and many other yellow varieties dominate the colourful scene. By September, the plants start podding and the valley dons tranquil shades of brown.

It is said that the root stock of almost all high altitude alpine flowers lie in and around the Valley of Flowers. The oak trees, blue pine and other conifers between Ghangria and the bridge on the Pushpawati are sometimes laden with ferns and tendrils hanging from their branches. The forests on the higher formations are full of birch trees, popularly known as bhojpatra whose bark was supposedly used to write on in ancient times.

Although the main valley is 4 km from Ghangria, flowers and foliage in exotic varieties can be spotted throughout the route. Immediately after crossing the Laxman Ganga, colonies of blue hackelia uncinata, commonly known as ‘forget me not,’ can be seen in the midst of shrubs and foliage along the roadside.Primulas, morinas, wild roses and many other species are found in abundance.

On reaching the banks of the Pushpawati, a rich formation of blue poppies, sun flowers, ligularia and pink andsosace can be seen between the rocky stretches near the bridge abetment. Further on, near the main valley, are gorgeous varieties of wild roses, rhododendron, geranium and the killer plant polygonum which has been offsetting the floral composition of the valley. A large variety of ferns like epiphytic, maidenhair and oak fern can be seen.

The valley is rich in herbal plants, many of these are flowering plants — bergenia, wood lily, trillium govanianum and marsh orchid are the popular ones. At several places, the dense growth of the flowering and non-flowering plants makes the valley look like a thick carpet that has been splashed with several colours.

A forbiddingly beautiful plant is arisaema costatum, popularly known as arum. Its head resembles that of a cobra. The plant grows in shady recesses, often in isolated family groups. Anemones, white dwarf rhododendrons, primulas and anaphalies give a white background to the valley. The violet iris kumaonesis, primula denticuleata in purple and potentillas in red, yellow and pink can also be seen.

Along the riverside there are small patches of land between scattered boulders, which have become the natural habitat of a majestic flower — the blue poppy. Known as meconopsis aculeata to botanists, it is a solitary flower and has the colour of the sky at dawn. Like most poppies, it is open and wide, droops slightly, has golden stamens, and is so fragile that its petals are detached merely by brushing against them. It protects itself with sharp spines arranged on the stem and buds.

The lily-like nomocharis oxypetala, a rare plant, blooms beautifully on the well-warmed, well-drained meadows of the valley. The rose-coloured cyprip edium himalaicum has earned the popular title of ‘lady’s slipper’ and there are a number of them in the valley.

The pinkish glow of the valley can be attributed to the large colonies of androsace, marsh orchid, geranium, pedicularis and thymus. Splashes of golden lily and creamy bell-shaped codonopsis are also seen. The pink pedicularis gives way to its yellow cousin — the mainstay of the August bloom. The potentillas are the first to appear and last to disappear from the valley.


UNECE on Knowledge Economy
Over the last 25 years advanced economies have become increasingly knowledge-based. The production, dissemination and use of knowledge have become a crucial factor for enhancing economic growth, job creation, competitiveness and welfare. Country-wise, the pace of this new type of economy expansion has varied. Some countries of the UNECE region have taken the lead and are reaping the benefits of accumulated research and development potential and accelerated innovation. Other countries have been slower in adapting to the new technological, economic and social challenges posed by the changing international environment.

In order to examine best practices, assess the readiness of the UNECE countries for the knowledge-based economy and contribute to decision-making facilitating its development, UNECE has initiated a programme on the emerging knowledge-based economy. Under this programme, the UNECE provides information and contributes to raising awareness of member States - particularly countries with economies in transition - regarding the emerging type of economy, decisively dependent on the inputs of human capital and on innovation.

Information and communication technologies (ICT) have played a leading role in the process of economic and social change mentioned above. On the one hand, the ICT industry has become a major source of innovation and accounted for strong investment and employment growth. On the other hand, the diffusion and uptake of ICT by other major sectors has resulted in enhanced growth and productivity of the economy as a whole.

The UNECE examines the issues of information and communications technologies as well as their economic impact under its sub-programme on Digital Economy Development. It undertakes the analysis of the impact of the emerging digital economy on the societies of member countries, related opportunities and challenges to economic development and social progress. The sub-programme aims at assisting member States in using ICT, capturing economic gains accruing from that use, facilitating their integration into the emerging global knowledge-based economy, as well as assisting them in assessing their readiness for the knowledge-based economy.

Thursday, 24 June 2004


Ooops! This is the bottom part
Baljit Grewal

this is the bottom part
Baljit Grewal

This is the new look site http://baljit.itgo.com
Baljit Grewal

Wednesday, 23 June 2004


A screenshot of an TV Advert for BioMag pain relief.
Baljit Grewal

This is the new format that I am thinking of implementing.ot much change, only little.
Baljit Grewal

A screenshot of my fotolog page today.
Baljit Grewal

A closer shot of the Google Adsense frame. It appears next to the moreover.com news feed. Both are implemented in an IFrame.
Baljit Grewal

A screeshot of my main webpage: http://baljit.itgo.com. I just added google adsense yesterday and I need to work the layout again
Baljit Grewal

A shot of Mt Makalu in Himachal Pradesh Posted by Hello

Patsy cline singing Crazy. Need I say more Posted by Hello

A shot of high Himalayas near manali (Himachal Pradesh) India Posted by Hello

Screen dump of Tv capture card Posted by Hello
Powered By Blogger